Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anton's avatar

This was so beautifully written—thank you, Maddie.

Your framing of temperance as a “yes” more than a “no” reminded me how easily we forget that virtue is about joy, not deprivation. The Hobbits embody this so tenderly: their feasting isn’t gluttony—it’s gratitude made visible. Their cheerfulness, their love of gardens, their midday songs—it’s all a quiet theology of enough.

The connection to Aquinas is spot on. Ordered pleasure isn’t indulgence—it’s alignment with divine design. The Hobbits don’t fear delight; they simply don’t hoard it. And that makes all the difference.

Loved the image of the tomb leading not to death but to life—and of course, to Sam’s garden. What a subtle and powerful way to show how denial gives way to abundance.

Expand full comment
Claire Laporte's avatar

What an interesting perspective! I had not thought of temperance or moderation as a virtue of hobbits. I need to go back and read Tolkien again!

Tolkien seems to have wanted to create something distinctively English - not Latinized, not Hellenized - yet temperance and moderation are hallmarks of Greek philosophy particularly. And to me, the hobbits seem to embody the virtues of the yeoman or husbandman - attached to the soil and its simple pleasures, but avoiding overindulgence because, like any people who are attached to land but lack great wealth, they know that abundance and want are two sides of the same coin.

A failure of temperance is typically a failing of those who have too much, which is why the teaching of the Greeks is so relevant now, when the powerful in most societies have far too much. The hobbits, though, live a much simpler life. Perhaps what Tolkien is really emphasizing is the benefit of not having too much, and the discipline engendered by having just the right amount.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts